首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of digital and conventional sketching: implications for conceptual design ideation
【2h】

A comparison of digital and conventional sketching: implications for conceptual design ideation

机译:数字和常规素描的比较:对概念设计构想的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study compared the use of digital and conventional sketching as influence upon conceptual design work. The results show a significantly increased focus of attention upon the sketching tool in the digital condition compared to conventional sketching with pen and paper. Both a statistical analysis and fine-grained qualitative comparison illustrate how increased frequencies of sketching tool focused activities resulted in both significantly more time spent in problem orientated work and the fragmentation of attempts to transition from problem definition to generative solution ideation. In contrast, reduced tool-focused activity in the conventional sketching condition appeared to provide opportunities for significantly increased solution ideation through design-driven moves to explore reflect upon and develop solution propositions. The implications of a tool orientated focus of attention are discussed in terms of its impact upon reflective solution ideation during conceptual design.
机译:该研究比较了数字素描和常规素描对概念设计工作的影响。结果表明,与使用笔和纸进行常规素描相比,在数字条件下对素描工具的关注明显增加。统计分析和细粒度的定性比较都说明,以草图工具为中心的活动的增加频率如何导致显着增加在面向问题的工作上花费的时间以及从问题定义到生成解决方案构想的尝试的分散性。相反,在传统的草图绘制条件下,以工具为中心的活动减少似乎为通过设计驱动的动作来探索思考并制定解决方案主张而显着增加解决方案构想提供了机会。讨论了以工具为中心的关注点的含义,该关注点在概念设计期间对反射解决方案构想的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号